Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Thoughts on Adoration...

In late May, a bunch of Folk and Lit Choir kids were back on campus for six days to sing for prayer services and liturgies for the Campus Ministry Symposium going down at Notre Dame. We were housed and treated as full participants, meaning not only were we put up in air-conditioned West Quad dorms but we could also attend talks and stuff. I welched out of a talk early in the week due to short attention span, but later in the week, I went to "Adoration to Action" with some friends to hear about connections between the solemn prayer and active service.

The room was full of maybe two dozen or so campus ministers and active religious who seemed to be in strong consensus that adorers were not concretely connecting their prayer to service work. The problem was more theoretical for me and my student-friends, but for these people, the situation was reality within their campuses. They were seeking ways to improve spirituality however you can improve spirituality. Their comments were insightful and eye-opening but reflected a sad reality that I'm sure sets in on many ministers as they face both the joys and frustrations--they mostly seemed to treat the situation as a "problem" that can have a "solution".

Some of the questions raised were thought provoking, so I'll re-offer some here for you and give my "answers" as well...

How should iconography around the Blessed Sacrament be? Should it be chosen to reflect active service to go with the prayer?

Our speaker, Mike Griffin from Holy Cross College, kicked around the idea with the group that perhaps the iconography and Church art surrounding Adoration could be chosen to more directly inspire thoughts and prayers on service. The thought is good, and we should embrace the diversity and variety of great patrons we have in Church Tradition. However, I draw the line at trying to effect more direct influence of people's prayer. I think that iconography is a rich opportunity to manifest the great stories and models of our faith, but we should not exploit it too much.

I feel that Adoration should occur in whatever places are available and willing to prepare the Exposition properly and piously. If the intention and organization exists, believers should be given the chance to pray before the Blessed Sacrament, which is not to say that we should just make every sacred space an arena for this kind of prayer. I don't think that chapels and churches should be altered or customized in any extraordinary way beyond doing that which increases the reverence and solemnity of the special prayer. On the other hand, if a chapel is being specially built new for a purpose, then the iconography should be selected in an intentional way to fit the community and/or patron. For instance, the new chapel in Geddes Hall, where the Center for Social Concerns is housed on campus, has stained glass window depicting the Corporal Works of Mercy and saints that epitomize the deeds. This is fitting and appropriate and utilizes the communion of saints in the right way, calling us to this action and emphasizing the luminous work of a Christian-influenced service organization. So having Exposition in there would carry those invocations but would not necessarily suggest manipulation. On the other hand, having Exposition in a different chapel but adding or changing iconography to be more in this vein suggests more of a manipulation to me. I think at most, all organizers of Adoration can do is supply a variety of inspiration to its participants...

Should prayer materials in Blessed Sacrament spaces intentionally encourage service and action?

I think that the key is variety so as not to infringe upon the freedom that one should carry with them into prayer. Prayer must be honest and heartfelt, so the participation in it by a believer can be an honest cultivation of their relationship with God. Adoration is an important opportunity for this because in enables a believer to bring this intention of being with God into stark reality, as they pray before the mysteriously present Christ.

I think an example of my view here can be seen in saints' feast days. Often when I go to daily mass in Zahm, Fr. Jim will invoke the saint whose feast day it is in the prayers of the mass and even in tidbits during the homily and/or the final blessing, whether through the actual book prayers or his own directive comments. Fr. Jim offers the saint, his or her story, and his or her patronage as an access point to prayer, an inspiration or spark to our spirits. However, he does not insist on our worship being focused solely on the saint. The mass remains an opportunity to hear the Word and celebrate the Eucharist. The inclusion of a saint and his or her feast simply adds to the diversity of access points we gain to worship of God, to prayer, and to growing closer to Him. The mass invites us to worship, but ultimately, Christ, in the Eucharist, remains the focus point. So it must be in Adoration.

Chapels for Adoration would do well to offer believers a variety of materials to help calm them down, inspire prayer, or provide words to one's prayer. However, the worship aids offered should not even implicitly limit or constrict the range of one's prayer. Regardless of one's motivation for coming before the Lord, one must come freely with his or her own thoughts and heart open to the Lord as Christ is profoundly before them. Prayer cards or inspirational readings on service would be helpful to inspiring Christian service and justice and action, but they can in no way be limiting or infringing upon the variety of ways that a believer can enter into this prayer. The line of prayer must be from the believer to God. Part of the Christian life is self-giving service, but it must come freely. Exposing a believer to the light and power of Christian service is important. However, it should not come through anything bordering coercion and definitely cannot come from anything resembling the manipulation of solemn prayer.

Why do we do Adoration? What is the purpose/function? (more an implied question from the discussion)

This is a tough question that, admittedly, I probably could not have answered until after Maria, Jason, and I started digesting the discussion after it ended. Thanks to hashing it out with them and thinking about it a bit, the best thing I can come up with is: Adoration is a unique, profound opportunity for solemn prayer literally before God. Our conversation hinted at how it should be something directly between the believer and Christ, but I think that realistically is has to be a bit wider than that ideal. The ideal is what we strive for, but as we grow, I think Adoration is an opportunity to contextualize one's life in a very unique, profound way.

When I go to adore, I bring it all with me.
Sometimes I only just get through worrying about it all in the half hour; other times, I can't finish worrying in the half hour; more frequently, thanks to advice from my spiritual director, I would get the worrying out of the way right away (he advised me to just put it all out there forthrightly and honestly but quickly and at the start so as to not simply worry before God, because that's not entirely what prayer is). Regardless of the amount of time I spent "worrying", it was an honest part of taking the time to sit before Christ in prayer. So even though the line was sacramentally, really, and profoundly between my heart and Christ, the reality and weights of my world remained an honest part of the equation. Adoration provides a special opportunity beyond the Eucharist of the mass to pray with and before Christ. It is an additional venue in which we can grow with and for Christ. Ultimately, Christ remains the focus and the triumph of this prayer, but in it, we can face our lives, our weaknesses and strengths, and our triumphs and our downfalls in a special environment where Christ is profoundly present in the mystery of the Eucharist.

2 comments:

  1. The "Problem-solution" perspective speaks directly to what I saw as the most glaring issue with the talk and ensuing discussion. I take issue with Adoration being approached as a means towards solving the divide between adorers and the peaceniks. It restricts, as you had said before, the freedom to explore the totality of prayer through Adoration. Telling, I think, is the suggestion of Pope John Paul II that an hour of adoration should be matched with an hour of service and not that and hour of adoration will count for one's hour of service.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right on, jace-face. The key to pairing that service with solemn prayer is solid catchesis, exposure to the fullness of faith, and a free decision to embrace the twofold call to prayer and action, to faith and works.

    ReplyDelete

Featured Post

Having a Lucy

by Dan Masterton Every year, a group of my best friends all get together over a vacation. Inevitably, on the last night that we’re all toge...